<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Christ in Colossians &#8211; Part 8 &#8211; Atonement &#8211; Jesus is Our Penal Substitutionary Atonement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gregqualls.com/2009/12/08/christ-in-colossians-part-8-atonement-jesus-is-our-penal-substitutionary-atonement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gregqualls.com/2009/12/08/christ-in-colossians-part-8-atonement-jesus-is-our-penal-substitutionary-atonement/</link>
	<description>speaking outside the box....sometimes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theodore A. Jones</title>
		<link>http://gregqualls.com/2009/12/08/christ-in-colossians-part-8-atonement-jesus-is-our-penal-substitutionary-atonement/comment-page-1/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator>Theodore A. Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregqualls.com/?p=637#comment-1225</guid>
		<description>&quot;they ever made&#039;? Who in the heck are they?  
As for your conjecture that Rom. 2:13 is not true you are assuming that the word law is only referring to the Sinai code which Paul references as the written code of law in Rom. 2:29, &quot;not by the written code.&quot; No person is justified righteous in God&#039;s sight by observing, i.e compliance, to the the written code. However a change was made to the law after Jesus&#039; crucifixion, ref. Heb. 7:12, which Paul amplifies. &quot;The (a) law was added (to the law) so that the trespass (the sin of murdering God&#039;s only begotten son) might increase.&quot; Rom. 5:20 
Your false salvific conjecture, substitutionary atonement, is only an observance of the written code.  
   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;they ever made&#8217;? Who in the heck are they? <br />
As for your conjecture that Rom. 2:13 is not true you are assuming that the word law is only referring to the Sinai code which Paul references as the written code of law in Rom. 2:29, &#8220;not by the written code.&#8221; No person is justified righteous in God&#8217;s sight by observing, i.e compliance, to the the written code. However a change was made to the law after Jesus&#8217; crucifixion, ref. Heb. 7:12, which Paul amplifies. &#8220;The (a) law was added (to the law) so that the trespass (the sin of murdering God&#8217;s only begotten son) might increase.&#8221; Rom. 5:20<br />
Your false salvific conjecture, substitutionary atonement, is only an observance of the written code.  <br />
   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gregqualls.com/2009/12/08/christ-in-colossians-part-8-atonement-jesus-is-our-penal-substitutionary-atonement/comment-page-1/#comment-1224</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregqualls.com/?p=637#comment-1224</guid>
		<description>I would agree if that was the only statement they ever made.  But Paul goes on to say a lot more in Romans 3...especially verse 20.  

20 For by works of the law no human being will be justified in his sight, since through the law comes knowledge of sin.

Looks like you need to read the rest of Romans....and maybe Ephesians, Galatians, Phillipians...well pretty much the whole New Testament.  There is a lot more that Romans 2:13.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree if that was the only statement they ever made.  But Paul goes on to say a lot more in Romans 3&#8230;especially verse 20.  </p>
<p>20 For by works of the law no human being will be justified in his sight, since through the law comes knowledge of sin.</p>
<p>Looks like you need to read the rest of Romans&#8230;.and maybe Ephesians, Galatians, Phillipians&#8230;well pretty much the whole New Testament.  There is a lot more that Romans 2:13.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theodore A. Jones</title>
		<link>http://gregqualls.com/2009/12/08/christ-in-colossians-part-8-atonement-jesus-is-our-penal-substitutionary-atonement/comment-page-1/#comment-1223</link>
		<dc:creator>Theodore A. Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 02:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregqualls.com/?p=637#comment-1223</guid>
		<description>&quot;It is not those who hear the law who are righteous in God&#039;s sight, but it is those who obey the law who will be declared righteous.&quot; Rom. 2:13
No person who thinks substitutionary atonement is true could or would make this statement. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is not those who hear the law who are righteous in God&#8217;s sight, but it is those who obey the law who will be declared righteous.&#8221; Rom. 2:13<br />
No person who thinks substitutionary atonement is true could or would make this statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

