Christ in Colossians – Part 2 – Jesus is Fully Human

While Paul clearly articulates the deity of Jesus, he doesn’t shy away from focusing on Jesus’ humanity. In Colossians 2:9, Paul makes the second of his statements about Jesus having all the fullness of deity dwell in Him, but Paul doesn’t end there. Within the same sentence, Paul uses one simple word that could seemingly be completely contradictory or at least paradoxical. Paul states that in Jesus “the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily” [emphasis added]. Paul is stating that Jesus is fully God while also being fully human.
Paul uses the word “bodily” (soma) in his statement to combat the thought that Jesus was simply a spirit that appeared to be human. This can be seen in Paul’s previous statement in Colossians that this body was a “body of flesh” (Col. 1:22). The Complete Word Study Dictionary explains that “in Col. 1:22 the expression ‘in the body of his flesh [sarx]’ means in his body incarnate, flesh that forms an organized whole. This is the antithesis of he psuche… , the soul … , and to pneuma … , the spirit … ; or where soma, psuche and pneuma make a peripharasis for the whole man.”[1] Jesus was God incarnate.
Paul also emphasized this fact in the references to Jesus’ death. Jesus is “the firstborn from the dead” [emphasis added] (Col. 1:18). Jesus reconciles all things “making peace by the blood of his cross” (Col. 1:19). “He has now reconciled in his body of flesh by his death” (Col. 1:22). We have “been buried with him in baptism” (Col. 2:12). Since God is immortal, these references to Jesus’ death can only be attributed to the fact that Jesus was human.
Now Paul isn’t simply saying in these passages that God simply put on a suit of flesh and walked around on earth for a little over 30 years and then removed it. He is saying that Jesus is 100% human. To every extent that we are human, Jesus is. These can be known from Paul’s statement that the Colossians are “reconciled in [Jesus’] body of flesh by his death, in order to present you holy and blameless and above reproach before him” (Col. 1:22). The only way that Jesus could have completely reconciled them was if he was completely human. The early church fathers made this clear in their defense against Apollinarianism at the Council of Constantinople. Fred Sanders explains:
Behind the rejection of Apollinarianism was a vision of salvation represented by the soteriological axiom: ‘What is not assumed is not healed.’ This axiom, articulated by Gregory of Nazianzus (who chaired part of the proceedings), presupposes that the Son of God saved humanity by ‘taking on’ or ‘assuming’ human nature into union with himself. Everything in human nature needs to be saved, so everything must be taken into union with Christ. In this light if Christ had no human soul, the human soul is left unredeemed.[2]
So when Paul says that we are “reconciled in his body of flesh” (Col. 1:22), this is only possible if Jesus is fully human. If any part of Jesus is less than human, then humanity could not be completely reconciled with God.
As you turn the pages of the letter to the Colossians, you can see that Paul wanted the readers to know that Jesus was fully human. This was not in contradiction to Jesus’ deity but in addition to it. In Jesus, “the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily” (Col. 2:9). Jesus was both fully God and fully man.
[1] Spiros Zodhiates, The Complete Wordstudy Dictionary: New Testament
[2] Scott Horrell et al., Jesus in Trinitarian Perspective: An Introductory Christology (B&H Academic, 2007), 20.






August 27th, 2010 - 04:00
First in greek the language of NT tempated was really the word tested thats why the Bible speak about the father being tested by the jews see math gospel this. You also may come accross colossians 2:9 but after compare it carefully with colossians 1:19 (which is still in context of same letter) we see that he speaking of The Holy Spirit. This makes sense when we look Galatians 1:1 which excludes Jesus as man claiming that He is God. Go to 1 John 5:1-8 we see here struggle between those antichrist christian who were influenced by philosophy which Paul worned about. You see the Philosophers at that time coming fro different religion: they were not concerned about Good vs Evil but Superior vs Inferior therfore they rejected the resurrection and a liter “in the flesh” because death was viewed by them as inferior. They were known by the NT writers but as 1 John 5 makes clear they departed with new belief. Just so that you don’t get confused about these simple things look at how Paul a first century man understood the phase “in the flesh” goto Philippians 1:21-24 this links the phse with being alive. you might read in Hebrews about being made perfect but that as sacfice for sins. I real know this stuf. Go to John 6:62 there you find out that The title Son of Man is the same one who made everything at John1:2. Notice how made sure not to take bible out of context of it’s authors like some have making whiled statements. You may also come across Genesis 3:22 where God said ” The man has become like One of Us” this telling since the right meaning of the name is The Cause of Breathe Outstanding Ones said” He the cause since he has breathe breathe life into man this not to be confused with “I am” as many have said. Like said I know this stuf.
August 28th, 2010 - 18:25
@Rbobar – I don’t know if you were trying to make a point. Cause you didn’t. All I read was a bunch random facts (possibly) strung together to stroke your ego.
“This “knowledge” puffs up, but love builds up.” – 1 Cor 8:2
You might be right (which I still understand what point you were trying to make), but I’m not able to read past your ego.